|
|
 |
AMPTP MEETS WITH SAG; WHAT NEXT?
Thursday, July 17 2008
|
|
A terse statement released by the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers following a two-hour meeting with the Screen Actors Guild on Wednesday raised new questions about what the two sides in Hollywood's bitter labor dispute will do next. "Both parties agreed that the contents of the meeting should be kept private," the statement said, adding that no further discussions had been scheduled at this time. The reference to "contents" immediately raised questions about whether the two sides had offered new proposals. If not, why then, were the discussions being kept secret? But mostly union members were asking, "Now what?" Several industry commentators were predicting that both sides will probably take a wait-and-see stance while SAG members decide whether the hard-line Membership First leadership will remain in control or whether a credible opposition can be mustered against them for the union's September elections. (July 24 is the deadline for nominations.) Most observers, however, are predicting that the current leadership will remain in place and that the stalemate will likely continue indefinitely.
|
2008: AN ECONOMIC DOWNTURN FOR ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY
Thursday, July 17 2008
The
entertainment
industry
--
the
third
largest
employer
in
Los
Angeles
County
--
will
see
its
growth
lag
significantly
behind
other
industries
this
year,
according
to
a
study
by
the
Los
Angeles
Economic
Development
Corporation.
The
LAEDC
blamed
labor
unrest.
The
writers'
strike,
it
said,
drained
$2.5
billion
from
the
county's
economy.
The
agency
did
not
indicate
the
cost
of
the
production
slow-down
caused
by
the
impasse
between
the
Screen
Actors
Guild
and
the
Alliance
(more)
AMPTP AND SAG TO MEET -- BUT WHY?
Wednesday, July 16 2008
Members
of
the
Alliance
of
Motion
Picture
and
Television
Producers
said
Tuesday
that
they
have
agreed
to
meet
informally
with
members
of
the
Screen
Actors
Guild
today
(Wednesday)
"out
of
respect
for
the
SAG
membership,"
but
they
continued
to
insist
that
they
are
done
negotiating.
It
was
not
clear
what
move
the
union
intended
to
make
at
the
meeting
or
whether
the
AMPTP
was
open
to
considering
any
new
proposals.
(Publicly
it
said
only
that
(more)
|
 |
|
|